Counter Argument Against Animal Rights And Cruelty

I understand that people who love animals want non-human animal rights, but along with animal rights comes a bunch a consequences. For example, if all animals were treated with nothing other than kindness, then there would be no zoos, no animal entertainment, no animal tests, no animal fur for clothes, no hunting, no medicine, no fresh meat, and no hard labor done. If you think hard about it, animals were not created to be kind to but to do our hard work, give us medicine, clothes, food etc.

Philosophers have stayed away from arguing about animal rights because of the consequences are so limiting for humanity. I think that only adult animals should have rights because they are ‘subjects-of-a-life’.

People who love animals should start facing the facts that this world is not all kindness to animals and no abuse, because it isn’t, we need animals to survive.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Counter Argument Against Animal Rights And Cruelty

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s